Subject	ah, indeed
Posted by	BradZ (FL) on October 16, 2004 at 12:39 AM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	Incorrect assumption hemi 4spd was option with sxpk 440 (n/m) posted by Mighty-Znoobie on October 16, 2004 at 12:33 AM
Message	I still don't understand how a 440-powered Challenger RT is supposed to bring in over $50k *shrug* :P 1992 Z32 2+2 NA 1986 Z31 Coupe NA AIM: RBA186
Follow Ups	Gaging interest in creating 300zx registry - Mighty-Znoobie 00:12:50 10/16/04 We have one already - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 00:29:38 10/16/04 hmmm... didn't see that in search, will try again for info - Mighty-Znoobie 00:35:51 10/16/04 What? - BradZ (FL) 00:29:42 10/16/04 Incorrect assumption hemi 4spd was option with sxpk 440 (n/m) - Mighty-Znoobie 00:33:51 10/16/04 ah, indeed - BradZ (FL) 00:39:10 10/16/04 May be a regional thing for this part of continental US - Mighty-Znoobie 00:48:12 10/16/04 As opposed to special subtraction? =) (n/m) - dragknt 02:12:47 10/16/04 hehe (n/m) - kaminooto 10:17:40 10/16/04 When you say Hemi 4 speed, do you mean it is the>> - SirpriZ 00:45:55 10/16/04 Yes, 4spd design/manf for 426. (n/m) - Mighty-Znoobie 00:50:14 10/16/04 why? (n/m) - Spee 00:50:28 10/16/04 VTD - original question "300zx registry" over shadowed (n/m) - Mighty-Znoobie 00:52:35 10/16/04 a 440 is not a Hemi ... which is it 440 or 426 Hemi (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 07:06:55 10/16/04 sounds like the 4 speed transmission is from a hemi. (n/m) - Marshall 11:13:43 10/16/04 when they're worth over $100k, sure - fourZero 11:12:03 10/16/04 I think it's a good idea, but... - J.R. (phx) 13:25:33 10/16/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.